Thursday, July 30, 2009

Breaking News Updates:

Concealed carry for out-of-state travel fails
The concealed carry ammendment would have allowed citizens who are already authorized to carry firearms concealed to do so when they travel out of state.Senator Thune pointed out that, while 48 states have some form of concealed carry law, his measure would simply "extend that constitutional right across State lines," recognizing that the right to bear arms and defend oneself "does not end at State borders or State lines." A prior Unanimous Consent agreement allowed the amendment to be offered in the first place, but as such, required that the legislation garner 60 votes (rather than a simple majority) in order to pass. Read Details
Update on birth certificate
So far the Hawaii hospital where Obama was supposedly born claimed they no longer had birth certificates from 1961. However the birth certificates of two twins were found born the day after Obama’s “birthday”. ON examination the certificates are quite close but don’t match in certain numbers, for instance Obama’s certificate says 1961 and there’s says only 61 suggesting counterfeit papers. Also, while their long form (detailed) birth certificates are made available Obama’s is for some reason still unattainable. Read details
Update on Sonia Sotomayer
Senate Judiciary Votes "Yes" on Sonia Sotomayor-- Full Senate to vote on her nomination soon
It was nearly a party-line vote. While every Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee voted in favor of Judge Sonia Sotomayor today, almost every Republican voted against her... all except for turncoat Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Please contact your two Senators and urge them to vote NO on Judge Sotomayor. Pre-written letter here

Alan Keyes on “Obama's 'noble truth' is a lie”

Keyes goes back through history to the time of Plato (pictured to the left) and his Republic wherein he, Plato, discusses “one noble lie” that would, if the people could be persuaded, enable social engineers to take over their development.
“All those in the city who happen to be older than 10 they will send out to the country; and taking over their children, they will rear them. …" (Plato's "Republic," Ibid. VII/540a.) Also, White House press secretary
Robert Gibbs says, “the noble truth is that the president was born in Hawaii, a state of the United States of America." Why does he say “noble” truth instead of simple truth, as if it were noble to tell a lie and call it truth. Read article

Walter William's article on “Exploiting Public Ignorance”

“How can political commentators, politicians and academics get away with statements like "Reagan budget deficits," "Clinton budget surplus," "Bush budget deficits" or "Obama's tax increases"? The only answer is that they, or the people who believe such statements, are ignorant, conniving or just plain stupid. Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution reads: "All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate…” Keep Reading

Howard Phillips exposes Wall Street funding the key to Obama’s success

Read the article and discover why Obama (and Bush) allowed this hotbed of deceit and thievery to continue. They support and are supported by the government! (Note: you have to scroll down on the website to see the article.)

Voddie Baucham discusses two video clips of Obama saying two very different things regarding his Health Care bill

“President Obama and the Democrats in Congress are working hard to “fix” America’s healthcare problem. However, the president claims he is not interested in a “single payer” (the government becomes the insurer of all and forces everyone to participate) approach. Unfortunately, Obama is on record for...” Keep Reading

Scott Brown on “How to Achieve Perpetual Childhood”

Why study history? There are many reasons. One reason is that we are commanded to study history-- "remember the days of old, consider the years of many generations" (Deut 32:7). Here is another reason posed by one of the reformers of the sixteenth century - it keeps us from "perpetual childhood" and "permanent obscurity."

"Human life without knowledge of history is nothing other than a perpetual childhood, nay a permanent obscurity and darkness."
--Philip Melancthon (1497–1560)

Doug Phillips discusses Harry Potter and allegories in general.

He discusses the presence of evil in allegories… can witches be represented as good? What about the White Witch of Narnia… Gandolf?
Read the article

Ben Botkin posted a piece of an interesting article titled “When Hooligans Bach Down”

From his blog: “His [Theodore Dalrymple’s] article raises an interesting question: if the emotional messages of classical/orchestral music are merely subjective, neutral, or as vague as most today give them credit for being, how could this music have such a profound effect on people– even those who haven’t developed an appetite for it?”

'Staying recently in a South Yorkshire town called Rotherham—described in one guidebook as “murky,” an inadequate word for the place—I was interested to read in the local newspaper how the proprietors of some stores are preventing hooligans from gathering outside to intimidate and rob customers. They play Bach over loudspeakers, and this disperses the youths in short order; they flee the way Count Dracula fled before holy water, garlic flowers, and crucifixes. The proprietors had previously tried a high-pitched noise generator whose mosquito-like whine only those younger than 20 could detect. This method, too, proved effective, but the owners abandoned it out of fear that it might damage the youths’ hearing and infringe upon their human rights, leading to claims for compensation.
There is surely something deeply emblematic about the use of one of the great glories of Western civilization, the music of Bach, to prevent the young inheritors of that civilization from committing crimes.' "
Read the article
Matt Chancey had to leave on a quick trip to Africa to rescue his friend from prison there. He had one hour to pack and recorded what he packs and what he packed it in … :) The “Fast Pack”

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Tennessee and Montana pass their own “Firearms Freedom Act

In his article, Let it Come, Chuck Baldwin addresses the issue of state autonomy.He says, “If we were writing a Declaration of Independence today, in which we would "let Facts be submitted to a candid world," the examples of federal abuse of power would be so multitudinous it would be difficult to contain them to a single document. The question is not, "Has the current federal government become tyrannical?" The question is, "How long will the States continue to tolerate it?" Read the article

Vote on Right to Carry coming soon!

From Gun Owners of America: “A vote to protect your right to travel out-of-state with a firearm could come to a vote next week -- even as early as Monday!... The benefit of the Thune/Vitter legislation is that -- unlike other, competing measures -- it would protect the right of any U.S. citizen to carry out of state (regardless of whether he possesses a permit), as long as he is authorized to carry in his home state. Please urge your Senators to vote YES on the Thune/Vitter concealed carry reciprocity amendment that will be offered to the Department of Defense authorization bill and NO on any modifying amendments.” Go Here to read details

Walter Williams says “diversity” codes in the military are provoking racism.

From his article: “I suspected that the Naval Academy's diversity agenda would give rise to resentments so I asked Professor Fleming about it. He said there are two levels of resentment. Some black students, who were admitted to the academy meritoriously on the same basis as white students, resent the idea of being seen as having the same academic qualities as blacks who were given preferential treatment, in other words being dumb. Another level of resentment comes from white students who see blacks as being admitted and retained at lower levels of academic performance and being treated with kid gloves. If these whites openly complained about the unequal treatment, they would run the risk of being labeled as racists. This is one of the unappreciated aspects of preferential treatment. It runs the risk of creating racist attitudes, and possibly feelings of racial superiority, among whites and others who were formerly racially neutral.”
Read the article

Congress does something right the week following the most recent Fourth of July


From Roy Moore’s article, “During the week following the recent Fourth of July, the United States Congress did something which was not only right, but which also honored that day in July 233 years ago when America was freed from the bondage of tyranny. Both Houses of Congress acknowledged God by ordering the Architect of the Capitol to…” Keep Reading

Voddie Baucham discusses the tremendous need for healthy churches

He says there is a lack of good leadership and fidelity to the Word of God in churches all over the country. Not every community has a core of Christians who will fight for truth. We can either search diligently and find a good church, we can plant our own or, worst case scenario, we can move. He says, “We uproot our families for better jobs, better houses, and better neighborhoods. Why not move for a healthy church? Of course, just like jobs, houses and neighborhoods, their is no guarantee that a healthy church will be exactly what you think it is.”
Read the article
(Romans 11:1-6 ESV)
“I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means! For I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, a member of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew. Do you not know what the Scripture says of Elijah, how he appeals to God against Israel? ‘Lord, they have killed your prophets, they have demolished your altars, and I alone am left, and they seek my life.’ But what is God’s reply to him? ‘I have kept for myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.’ So too at the present time there is a remnant, chosen by grace.”

Chalcedon Foundation Videos

These video’s on the Federal Reserve and other Financially corrupt organizations are excellent and educational.

The first is a questioning of the Federal Reserve Chairman who is collecting interest on our money by loaning it to Europeans and New Zealanders. The chairman feels a little fishy… :) Go Here
The Second is Glenn Beck illustrating how the company Goldman Sachs uses politics to deal unjustly and gain advantage. Go Here

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Cap and Trade Bill passed

Judge Roy Moore discusses the economic implications of Obama’s Cap and Trade bill that places huge penalties on fossil fuel plants, coal refineries etc. because of the sum of greenhouse gasses being emitted. Roy Moore says, “The end result is that once again American companies faced with the increasing costs of doing business in this country will be forced to move to South America, China, or India, taking thousands of jobs with them.” This is an environmentalist’s dream come true, but for many of us it is just a continuation of the downward spiral towards socialism in America. This bill called the “Waxman-Markey” bill will cost the average household $2,979.00 annually, and is entirely based on the unscientific premise of global warming! Read the article

How Much Cooling is Enough?

Walter William’s column this week is very fitting. He says, “Last March, more than 700 international scientists went on record dissenting over manmade global warming claims. About 31,500 American scientists, including 9,029 with Ph.D.s, have signed a petition, that in part reads, "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate." And yet, politicians like Al Gore have planted their flag on this issue forcing us to suffer for their false convictions. Also, in Walter William’s article he discusses what happens to a politician or scientist who dares to contradict global warming. Read the article

Alan Keyes says Sarah Palin’s resignation is not consistent with her sworn duty to defend the state!

Alan Keyes talks about Cicero(pictured to the left as a young boy reading) and the original meaning of the word public “office” and its correlating duties. If Sarah Palin were admitting that she has not used her authority wisely or that she has championed unjust laws then resignation would be in order, but she is not taking this position. She claims to have fulfilled the duties of her office and (from Alan Keye’s article)“argues that the circumstances of her promise changed because others practiced ‘the politics of personal destruction’… It appears that the main reason for Palin's decision is her opponents' politically motivated abuse of a law she advocated… If she is without fault or blame, then Palin's explanation makes no sense except as a clear dereliction of duty. She swore faithfully to perform the duties of her office. She claims to have done so. Others have abused the law to attack her. She successfully defended against them. If, as she contends, she has simply been performing her duties, her defense of herself is in fact simply a defense of her office, in the literal sense. To preserve that office with integrity is one of her duties as governor. By resigning, she fails in the performance of that duty.” Read the article

King Barack? (the title of David Limbaugh’s article)

From his article: “Indeed, there are so many Obama abuses I can only chronicle a fraction of them in a short column. But just consider a few others, and ask yourself how long even rank-and-file Democrats can justify supporting such tyrannical madness by this arrogant chief executive, who truly is – as distinguished from Bush – engaged in a daily quest to "dictate" fundamental, structural changes to this nation:”
Here are a few of his offenses (this sounds like the Declaration of Independence!)

  • Obama's thugs fired AmeriCorps inspector general Gerald Walpin and slandered him as virtually demented because he blew the whistle on the corrupt practices of Obama's buddies.
  • Obama is so intent on bullying our ally Israel that he is breaching a previous Bush administration-negotiated agreement between Israel and the United States to allow some Israeli construction in West Bank settlements to allow for natural growth.
  • Obama has so insulated himself from ordinary press scrutiny that even liberal journalists Chip Reid and Helen Thomas grilled White House press secretary Robert Gibbs for Obama's "tightly controlled" town hall meeting on health care. During that forum, Obama "coincidentally" called on three people (out of 200) who work with groups trying to pass his health care proposal.

Read the article

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Apologies and Reparations to African-Americans

Walter Williams discusses the impossibility and pointlessness of paying reparations to descendants of slaves. Who would pay these reparations? Descendants of recent immigrants?
From his article… “It goes without saying that slavery was a gross violation of human rights. Justice would demand that all the perpetrators -- that includes slave owners, and African and Arab slave sellers -- make compensatory reparation payments to victims. Since slaves, slave owners and slave sellers are no longer with us, such compensation is beyond our reach and a matter to be settled in the world beyond.” Read Article

Obama’s Cap and Trade bill

(This bill has currently passed the house)
From the blog of John Killian… “The Tax Foundation report claims that Cap and Trade legislation will add $1,145 in costs per family per year or 6.2% of the average income of the typical working family. Consider Phyllis Schaffly's article on Cap and Trade. Also, check out the Alabama Eagle Forum information on Cap and Trade.Cap and Trade legislation deals with carbon emissions as a cause of global warming. Musings from Maytown has opined that the entire theory on global warming is the greatest fraud foisted upon this generation.”
Watch a 5 min. video clip by Ron Paul on the Cap and Trade bill.

Justice Ginsburg Says She Originally Thought Roe v. Wade Was Designed to Limit 'Populations That We Don’t Want to Have Too Many Of'



Read this article about Feminist Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg who literally believes that tax payers, US citizens, should fund the murder of innocent lives because “a woman has the right to choose”. If everyone had the right to choose whether or not they would follow the law in a given situation what good would the law do? This is basically what has happened in America. Read the article

Wikipedia says Obama born in Kenya


Wikipedia goes back and forth, sometimes claiming Obama may have been born in Kenya, which would invalidate his eligibility for presidency. Sadly, this mystery is still left undiscovered and Obama spends estimated hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep this information from the public. Hmm… Read the Article (from outside link)

Thursday, July 2, 2009

The History of Independence Day

March, 1775, Patrick Henry:

“It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, "Peace! Peace!" -- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!


On Monday, July 1, 1776, Archibald Bullach, president of Georgia, wrote in a letter,

“This morning is assigned the greatest debate of all,… A declaration, that these colonies are free and independent states, has been reported by a committee some weeks ago for that purpose, and this day or tomorrow is to determine it’s fate. May heaven prosper the newborn republic.”

The question of Independence had already been exhausted in Congress and it was thought that the issue would simply be put to vote, but not so.

Pictured: Independence Hall in Philadelphia, 1776

John Dickenson, of Pennsylvania offered a final appeal that started a debate lasting nine hours. When the preliminary vote was cast 9 out of 13 voted yes. It was decided to postpone the final vote to the morrow.
Tonight, the first of 400 British warships are sighted off the coast of New York.

The following morning the final vote is cast and Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Delaware swing towards Independence! The vote is unanimous. July 2, 1776, in Philadelphia, the American colonies declared Independence.

Pictured: The Thirteen Colonies

In a letter to his wife, Abigail, John Adams writes,

“The second day of July will be the most epocha in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated to succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the Day of Deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illustrations from one end of this continent to the other from this time forward forever more.”
On the third of July, the document, The Declaration of Independence, was edited, cut, and revised and on the fourth of July the final vote for the document was taken and passed, twelve colonies voting in the affirmative and New York abstaining.
The following paragraph is from Lossing’s Lives of the Signers, p. 12,

“On the morning of the day of its adoption, the venerable bell-man ascended to the steeple, and a little boy was placed at the door of the Hall to give him notice when the vote should be concluded. The old man waited long at his post, saying, “They will never do it, they will never do it.” Suddenly a loud shout came up from below, and there stood the blue-eyed boy, clapping his hands, and shouting, “Ring! Ring!!” Grasping the iron tongue of the bell, backward and forward he hurled it a hundred times, proclaiming, Liberty to the land and the inhabitants thereof.”
Only John Hancock’s signature was applied to the document as yet.

On the second of August, 1776 the actual signing of the Declaration of Independence took place. Everything was done in secret and not published in newspapers or correspondence because of the extreme peril of the situation.

“The signing of the instrument was a solemn act, and required great firmness and patriotism in those who committed it. It was treason against the home government, yet perfect allegiance to the law of right. It subjected those who signed it to the danger of an ignominious death, yet it entitled them to the profound reverence of a disenthralled people. But, neither firmness nor patriotism was wanting in that august assembly. And their own sound judgment and discretion, their own purity of purpose and integrity of conduct, were fortified and strengthened by the voice of the people in popular assemblies, embodied in written instructions for the guidance of their representatives.”
Lossing’s Lives of the Signers p. 11

I would be perfectly clear here that the celebration of Independence Day is not a declaration of independence from God, the Scriptures, civil government, or even independence of each other as human beings but independence of tyranny and wrongful, ungodly government. As the concluding line of the Declaration of Independence says, “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”
In this age we often associate independence with autonomy and individualism, but nothing could be further from the intents of our country’s founders than to be independent of God.
The American Revolution was so wholly different from any other revolution and found it’s roots in the Reformation; i.e. the idea of freedom of conscience, the idea that a king is not divine but appointed by God and thus subject to the Law of God, and further that if a ruler does not hold to the moral obligations of Scripture and violates the conscience of the people it makes void its authority (Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos, The Legal Claim Against Tyrants). Where the French sought autonomy from man and God and gained anarchy in it’s worst form during their revolution in 1789, America sought reliance on God and sought to form a republic ruled by the law, fashioned after the Word of God and not a democracy ruled by the mass of people fashioned after their current likes and dislikes.
There is something very deep and awe inspiring about the purpose behind the Declaration of Independence. They, the “signers”, were willing to be “stepping stones” like the pilgrims and sacrifice much so that future generations might honor God in every aspect of their lives. Much has been written in gratefulness towards our forbears by others much better than I. My hope is that we, generations later, would not forget!

Psalm 78 says, "Give ear, O my people, to my law; Incline your ears to the words of my mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable; I will utter dark sayings of old, Which we have heard and known, And our fathers have told us. We will not hide them from their children, Telling to the generation to come the praises of the LORD, And His strength and His wonderful works that He has done. For He established a testimony in Jacob, And appointed a law in Israel, Which He commanded our fathers, That they should make them known to their children; That the generation to come might know them, The children who would be born, That they may arise and declare them to their children, That they may set their hope in God, And not forget the works of God, But keep His commandments; And may not be like their fathers, A stubborn and rebellious generation, A generation that did not set its heart aright, And whose spirit was not faithful to God."

Walter Williams discusses the 1st amendment(freedom of speech) and also the ninth and tenth amendments


A MINORITY VIEW
BY WALTER WILLIAMS
RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 2009

Why a Bill of Rights?

Why did the founders of our nation give us the Bill of Rights? The answer is easy. They knew Congress could not be trusted with our God-given rights. Think about it. Why in the world would they have written the First Amendment prohibiting Congress from enacting any law that abridges freedom of speech and the press? The answer is that in the absence of such a limitation Congress would abridge free speech and free press. That same distrust of Congress explains the other amendments found in our Bill of Rights protecting rights such as our rights to property, fair trial and to bear arms. The Bill of Rights should serve as a constant reminder of the deep distrust that our founders had of government. They knew that some government was necessary but they rightfully saw government as the enemy of the people and they sought to limit government and provide us with protections.
After the 1787 Constitutional Convention, there were intense ratification debates about the proposed Constitution. Both James Madison and Alexander Hamilton expressed grave reservations about Thomas Jefferson's, George Mason's and others' insistence that the Constitution be amended by the Bill of Rights. Those reservations weren't the result of a lack of concern for liberty. To the contrary, they were concerned about the loss of liberties.
Alexander Hamilton expressed his reservation in Federalist Paper No. 84, "(B)ills of rights ... are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous." Hamilton asks, "For why declare that things shall not be done (by Congress) which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given (to Congress) by which restrictions may be imposed?" Hamilton's argument was that Congress can only do what the Constitution specifically gave it authority to do. Powers not granted belong to the people and the states. Another way of examining Hamilton's concern: Why have an amendment prohibiting Congress from infringing on our right to picnic on our back porch when the Constitution gives Congress no authority to infringe upon that right in the first place?
Alexander Hamilton added that a Bill of Rights would "contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more (powers) than were granted. ... (it) would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power." Going back to our picnic example, those who would usurp our God-given liberties might enact a law banning our right to have a picnic. They'd justify their actions by claiming that nowhere in the Constitution is there a guaranteed right to have a picnic.
To mollify Alexander Hamilton's and James Madison's fears about how a Bill of Rights might be used as a pretext to infringe on human rights, the Ninth Amendment was added that reads: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." In essence, the Ninth Amendment says it's impossible to list all of our God-given or natural rights. Just because a right is not listed doesn't mean it can be infringed upon or disparaged by the U.S. Congress. The Tenth Amendment is a reinforcement of the Ninth saying, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." That means if a power is not delegated to Congress, it belongs to the states of the people.
The Ninth and Tenth Amendments mean absolutely nothing today as Americans have developed a level of naive trust for Congress, the White House and the U.S. Supreme Court that would have astonished the founders, a trust that will lead to our undoing as a great nation.
Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

An article by Judge Roy Moore

Obama's attack on our Christian heritage
Posted: June 24, 20091:00 am Eastern© 2009
"Every Fourth of July we celebrate that day 233 years ago when 56 men voted for American independence, but many do not know that it was not until Aug. 2 of 1776 that the Declaration of Independence was formally signed by most of the delegates to the Second Continental Congress. In a speech given at Independence Hall on the evening of Aug. 1, 1776, Samuel Adams – often called the Father of the American Revolution – spoke to an assembled crowd about the spiritual and religious significance of what he and others had done on July 4th:
"We have explored the temple of royalty, and found that the idol we have bowed down to, has eyes which see not, ears that hear not our prayers, and a heart like the nether millstone. We have this day restored the Sovereign, to whom alone men ought to be obedient. He reigns in Heaven, and with a propitious eye beholds his subjects assuming that freedom of thought, and dignity of self-direction which He bestowed on them. From the rising to the setting sun, may His kingdom come."

Sixty-one years later, on July 4, 1837, at an Independence Day celebration at Newburyport, Mass., President John Quincy Adams, a cousin of Samuel Adams and son of President John Adams (who helped draft the Declaration of Independence), spoke of the link between the birth of Jesus Christ and that of our country:
"Why is it that, next to the birth day of the Savior of the World, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day? ... Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer's mission upon earth? That it laid the corner stone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity ...?"

Judge Roy Moore's classic book about his battle for liberty is now available in paperback: "So Help Me God: The Ten Commandments, Judicial Tyranny, and the Battle for Religious Freedom"
Throughout our history both houses of Congress recognized our Christian heritage by opening with prayer by Christian ministers. When that practice was challenged in 1853 the House boldly responded that Christianity was "the religion of the founders of the republic, and they expected it to remain the religion of their descendents." The U.S. Senate was even more to the point stating:
"We are Christians ... and in a land thus universally Christian, what is to be expected, what desired, but that we shall pay a due regard to Christianity, and have a reasonable respect for its ministers and religious solemnities?"

Yet today our Christian heritage is under attack as never before. In April 2009, the president of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, while admitting that America has "a very large Christian population," told the Turkish press that "we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation. ..." Two months later in an interview with a French reporter, Obama had the audacity to state that "if you actually took the number of Muslim Americans, we'd be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world." Finally, on June 4, in a speech in Cairo , Egypt, Obama said that he felt it his duty and "part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear."
Not only has the president of the United States denied our Christian heritage and identity, but he went so far as to claim that America was one of the largest Muslim countries in the world. In fact, in 2008 Christians made up 76 percent of the population (173 million), religious Jews 1.2 percent (2.6 million), and Muslims only 0.6 percent (1.3 million).
Obama's brash remarks not only contradict fact, they contradict the United States Supreme Court, which declared in 1892 in the case of Church of the Holy Trinity v. U.S. that many examples of the Christian religion in our society "add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian Nation." Later, in 1931, in U.S. v. Macintosh the Court reaffirmed that:
"We are a Christian people … according to one another the equal right of religious freedom, and acknowledging with reverence the duty of obedience to the will of God."

Obama's responsibility as president is not to "fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear," but rather to defend our Christian faith and the Christian religion upon which rests the future happiness and prosperity of our country.
This duty is especially important as our nation prepares to celebrate the anniversary of that day when America shook off the chains of tyranny, appealed to the "Supreme Judge of the World," and relied on the protection and support of "Divine Providence." While Americans celebrate our independence as a country, we must continue to recognize our spiritual dependence upon the Judeo-Christian God in Whom we still trust."


Judge Roy Moore is the chairman of the Foundation for Moral Law in Montgomery, Ala. He is the former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court who was removed from office in 2003 for refusing to remove a Ten Commandments monument he had placed in the Alabama Judicial Building to acknowledge God. Moore's classic book about his battle for liberty is now available in paperback: "So Help Me God: The Ten Commandments, Judicial Tyranny, and the Battle for Religious Freedom."

Gangster Government

Michelle Bachman illustrates the development of our beloved country into a communist state in this video. She focuses on the policy behind government bailouts. Basically, if you flatter and patronize a certain democrat politician your business may probably get bailed out. She urges all Americans to not think they are immune… it could happen to you next!